Why So Many "Translations." by Dean Gotcher

Why So Many "Translations?"
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

If you have one will then there is no confusion, i.e., no dialogue, i.e., "I think" and "I feel," i.e., no opinion at the reading of the will, making everyone subject to the position (desire) of the writer of the will. If there is more than one will then there is confusion, i.e., dialogue, i.e., "I think" and "I feel," i.e., opinion at the reading of the wills, making the position (desire) of the writer of the will subject to the carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of those present at the reading of the will. While there was debate as to some of the copies of the Greek and Hebrew texts used in what is called the Textus Receptus, the scriptural source of the "Protestant Reformation," the major conflict between the "churches" is due to the translation, i.e., how the text is interpreted. Yet anyone could go to the original text, listed in Strong's Concordance and work out for themselves what they believed the text was saying. The Tyndale, King James, and Geneva Bibles differed only in how their translators interpreted the Textus Receptus. What Martin Luther came to realize, while earnestly searching the scriptures in order to be a good Catholic was the Catholic scriptures were based upon text that was changed from the original, with many varied interpretations, dependent upon the opinion of the writer of the text. This is why the congregants were prevented from having access to the text in order to keep the Priests, Bishops, and Pope's in control over the church. The congregates having access to the text, even from the Catholic heretical source cost Huss his life. Later, having translated the scriptures to English cost Tyndale his life, at the hands of the Catholic Church, with King James approval, only later realizing Tyndale was right (eighty percent of the KJV is from Tyndale's translation, ninety percent of the Geneva Bible being from the same source). The key to control over "the people" is for leadership to have control over the source of information the people read or hear. The Textus Receptus and the translations that followed put control back into "the peoples" hands, directly under God's Word itself aka "Priesthood of all believers." In a discussion, truth is external to the person, requiring him to humble, deny, die to his "self" in order to hear and receive it. In dialogue, truth is subject to the person's carnal desires of the 'moment,' requiring him to suspend as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of his carnal desires of the 'moment,' making him subject to anyone interpreting it for him, i.e., "ticking his ears." In the nineteenth century Westcott and Hort contaminated the "Protestant" scriptures with Catholic Gnostic documents, i.e. Vaticanus B, Sinaiticus אּ, Codex X, MSS, the sources (Nestle, Aland, Metzger) all ministers from seminary are trained on. The idea being, if you can not keep the scriptures out of the hands of "the people" then make sure they are in conflict with themselves so "the people" have to turn to man, i.e., men's opinions to explain them. Since then dialogue, i.e., "I feel" and "I think" has made God's word subject to the opinions of men, making the church subject to facilitators of 'change' instead of to God, the Father and his Word. It is not the translation that is the problem. It is the source from which the translation is being made. One leads to God alone. The other to a man determining what God means, i.e., says, compromising God's Word in order to "get along," the effect of dialogue. The 'moment' the "church" brings dialogue into the study of God's Word, following after a facilitator of 'change' it is apostate, i.e., no longer following after the Lord, doing the Father's will, but "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' including the praises of men, that the world stimulates. The use of many different "translations" results in confusion, i.e., the intended purpose so the leader can turn the focus to himself instead of to God. Being more focused upon getting along, i.e., "human relationship" the "church" has rejected God and His Word for the approval of men, the difference between discussion (one source) and dialogue (many sources). Protestant ministers today are more Catholic than they know or are willing to admit.

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"... and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12